![]() |
![]() Philippe Barbat |
Curator,
French Records and
Archives Directorate
Abstract
Paris city archivist Yves Pérotin first identified records management practices for France during fact-finding visits to the U.S. and Britain in the
1960’s. His reports back to the Prefect
of the Seine laid the foundations for French national archival practice and put
archivists firmly in charge of recordkeeping in the republic. The author, a curator at the French Records
and Archives Directorate of the
Ministry of Culture in Paris, outlines the unique history of the French
development in this 1999 paper he presented to an archives and records management
seminar in Melbourne, Australia.
It is thanks to two
fundamental articles by Yves Pérotin, archivist of the City of Paris, that French archivists
discovered records management. The first was the report of a professional trip
to the United States that Yves Pérotin, then Director of the Archives of the
Seine (Paris), made on behalf of the Prefect of the Seine (Paris) in October
1961. The aim of the trip was to study solutions implemented in America to
manage current and semi-current records.
![]() |
When he came
back, Pérotin wrote "Records
management and the American administration of archives" which was
published in 1962. Less than two years later, in January 1963, Pérotin went to
London, again on behalf of the Prefect of the Seine, with the same object as
the previous trip. He summed up his experience in a second article, published
in the Gazette des Archives in 1964: "Records management and the
English administration of archives".
These two texts,
although written more than thirty years ago, are certainly the best
presentation of records management as a whole in French language to this day.
It is not easy to summarise the conclusions that Pérotin drew from his two
experiences. So much of his observation
of the methods of records management is precise and detailed.
It is obvious, however,
that Yves Pérotin wished to see France follow the example of England and the
United States on three points: the intermediate storage, the control by
archivists of current records and the responsibilities of the records creators.
These three lessons are among the most important French archivists have learned
from the 60’s. They have been a crucial foundation to the history of records
management in France.
Around the end of the
60’s and the beginning of the 70’s they also produced much theoretical debate
when intermediate storage was at the centre of French reflection on records
management. Among a rich bibliography,
one can mention a chapter of the Manuel d’archivistique, a reference
book for archivists published in 1970, entitled: " The creation of the
records and the intermediate storage ".
Intermediate storage is
the aspect of records management that most influenced Yves Pérotin. The wide place that he dedicates to it in
his articles testifies to this. It quickly aroused great interest amongst
French archivists who saw in the techniques a solution to the problem of
dealing with the ever-increasing masses of paper produced by administrations
and companies. This interest explains why France decided to build a records
centre large enough to welcome the semi-current records produced by the various
ministries.
Thus, the Cité
Interministérielle des Archives was created in 1967 in Fontainebleau, near
Paris. This huge records centre, dedicated in the beginning exclusively to
intermediate storage, had its aims and objectives extended later on and is now
devoted only to historical records from 1958. The semi-current records produced
by administrations are nowadays stored in repositories close by in order to
avoid waste of transportation time and cost.
The control by
archivists of the management of current records within creating organisations
appears among the fundamental principles of records management. French
archivists are more and more convinced that the creation of historical archives
usable by researchers depends on a supervision exercised upstream, while
documents are still in offices. If current records are not properly managed,
they can produce only difficult, extra work for archivists who are forced to
reconstitute a coherence compromised by the disorder in which documents reach
them.
Now, so that control
can be exercised effectively, it is imperative that the field of intervention
by archivist increases. Their job must not be just the final link in the chain
of the world of the work, the only responsibility being the charge of documents
when they are not of use any more to those who produce them. On the contrary,
archivists must be able to exercise a right to oversee and give advice on the
management of current records.
![]() Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication |
One of the proofs of
this evolution within the profession appears in Article 2 of the Decree of
December 3, 1979 (one of the decrees of application of the law of January 3,
1979 on records and archives) which explains that the French Directorate of
Records and Archives at the Ministry of Culture is tasked with "the control of the keeping of the
current records in the premises of services, establishments and public
organisations, including the public or ministerial offices, that produced or
received them". Thus, the control of the current records has been given a
statutory value in the field of the public records since then.
The responsibility of
the record creator is the most problematic area of records management in France
today. Unlike Germany, for example,
France has no tradition of registration or of classification of documents by
those who produce them. This results in extreme contrasting situations, going
from total carelessness to the most pushed attention, as within the police
force, for instance. Throughout the country, control by record creators varies
according to administrations or companies.
Establishing the
responsibilities of the records creators is a hard task in this context.
Nevertheless, since the end of the 60’s, great improvements have been made,
mostly at the instigation of Government Ministry archive curators who have been
able to give evidence of the efficiencies to be gained.
So, the naming of
officers in charge of records within organisations constitutes a fruitful
initiative. It gives the archivist someone to speak to, someone who knows about
questions connected with records and is responsible for their treatment. Also,
the creation of records schedules and classification schemes, often created by
negotiation between the archivist and the staff of an office, raises awareness
that good management of records is profitable to all.
The archivist
demonstrates that he helps improve the efficiency of the work of each. Finally,
the production of brochures giving practical advice on treatment of current
records within offices contributes in a substantial way to a better
understanding of those who produce documents.
From this point of
view, the existence of an international standard giving guidelines for records
management within organisations will be very useful in a country like
France. It will certainly make the work
of French records managers and archivists easier.
That’s why the whole
profession takes a great interest in the work being done by the International
Standards Organisation Sub-committee SC11 in preparing the Records Management
Standard ISO15489 and looks forward to its publication in due course.
![]() Top |
Parisian Philippe Barbat was educated as an archivist and palaeographer at the Ecole Nationale des Chartes in Paris. He studied records management and the archives administration at the National Heritage School. Since 1997, he has worked for the French Records and Archives directorate at the Ministry of Culture, where he is responsible for developing records schedules for police and justice administrations. He is a member of the editorial committee of the ISO Records Management Standard, ISO15489. Recently, he was appointed co-ordinator of a study leading to a new French law for records and archives.
To go to the RIMOS home page 
To go to The Caldeson Consultancy main index page 